30 Mar 2010 13:00 Africa/Lagos
Webroot Research: One Year Later, Social Networkers Are Savvier About Keeping Information Private, But Still Take Risks
Second Annual Survey Shows 37 Percent More Users Block Strangers From Viewing Their Profiles Through A Google Search, Yet 81 Percent Allow Anyone on Their Network to See Their Recent Activity
BOULDER, Colo., March 30 /PRNewswire/ -- As the amount of activity on social networks continues to grow, more members are taking steps to protect their privacy but opportunities abound for security risks, according to new research commissioned by Webroot, a leading provider of Internet security software for the consumer, enterprise and SMB markets.
Webroot's second annual study surveyed more than 1,100 members of Facebook, LinkedIn, MySpace, Twitter and other popular social networks. The survey showed an increasing awareness among social network users of how to keep personal information private. At the same time, it revealed how social network users still put their identities and sensitive information at risk. Among the findings:
-- More users are practicing certain safe behaviors, including blocking
their profiles from being visible through public search engines - a 37
percent increase over last year.
-- Yet more than a quarter of respondents have never changed their
default privacy settings.
-- And more than three quarters place no restrictions on who can see
their recent activity.
Social networks are a growing Web destination - and a growing target for cybercriminals
Facebook membership grew to more than 400 million active users, a 229 percent jump over the previous year(1). For the week ending March 13, Facebook surpassed Google in the United States to become the most visited Web site for the week(2). And earlier this month, Twitter reported a 1,500 percent growth in the number of new registered users in the course of a year(3).
"A perfect storm is developing between the number of people flocking to social networks and the new, increasingly sophisticated malware attacks cybercriminals are launching to prey on the personal data they're sharing," said Jeff Horne, director of Threat Research at Webroot. "For example, our team has noted over 100 different variations of Koobface, a worm known to trick people into clicking links they shouldn't in order to infect their PC's and often convince them to provide credit card numbers to buy phony antivirus products, among other fraudulent activities."
In addition, Webroot has seen a rise in spam on social networks, which commonly contains links to malicious Web site links: The Webroot survey showed a 23 percent increase in spam received on social networks since last year.
Summary of Key Findings
Social network users are sharing information that could help hackers breach their profiles, their wallets and possibly their homes:
-- Sixty-one percent include their birthday
-- Fifty-two percent include their hometown
-- Seventeen percent make their cell phone available.
-- More than three quarters (77 percent) don't restrict who can access
their photo albums.
-- Eighty-one percent don't place any restrictions on who can see their
recent activity, including updates generated by geo-location-based
tools that report where their users are visiting.
Younger users (ages 18-29) are the least likely to take steps to safeguard their information.
-- Forty-three percent of young users use the same password across
multiple sites compared to 32 percent overall.
-- Forty percent of younger users say they accept friend requests from
strangers while only 29 percent of total users have.
-- And while 69 percent of the general population has clicked on a link
sent or posted by a friend, 77 percent of younger users have done so.
Privacy settings continue to be underutilized.
-- Twenty-eight percent of users report they've never changed their
default privacy settings.
-- Seventy-three percent were aware of Facebook's December 2009 privacy
changes which automatically exposed their full profiles by default.
-- But 42 percent report they haven't made changes to their settings
since the switch.
But modest gains are being made toward safeguarding personal information on social networks.
-- Twenty-seven percent of users now restrict who can find their profile
through a public search engine, up from 20 percent last year.
-- Sixty-seven percent now use different passwords for each of their
social networks, up from 64 percent last year.
-- Forty-seven percent know who can see their profile, up from 41 percent
last year.
What Can Users Do?
"Consumers need to better protect themselves by guarding their profiles and setting stricter privacy policies - especially given the growing popularity in location-based social media tools that broadcast where you are. It's also important to make sure your computer has an added layer of security to stop attacks before they happen," continued Horne.
To help consumers understand and protect themselves from these types of attacks, Webroot has provided the following tips as a guideline for safer social networking:
-- Make personal information private--Protect yourself by updating
privacy settings on your profile to restrict or omit access to any
personal data. Users of popular geo-location services that allow you
to share where you are should be especially careful to not disclose
your location to the wrong people.
-- Read between the lines--Familiarize yourself with the social networks'
privacy options to ensure you're taking advantage of any enhanced
security features.
-- Be exclusive--Only accept friend requests, emails and site links from
people you know and even then, be selective about what you open.
Accepting items from sources you do not know could expose you to
malicious malware.
-- Protect the password--As a critical line of defense, it is more
important than ever for members to choose their passwords wisely, and
make them different from one site to the next. Incorporating numbers,
letters and special characters like !, $, and * into your password
makes it stronger. Webroot also recommends changing your password at
regular intervals, and never use the same password at more than one
site.
-- Suite Security-- Protect your PC with an Internet security suite that
includes antivirus, antispyware, and firewall technologies.
-- Always automate software updates--If you're already using antimalware
software, be sure to install updates which include the latest malware
definitions. Do the same with updates to your operating system,
Internet browser and other key applications. However, watch out for
fake software updates like emails that purport to be from Microsoft
which require you click on a link to update Windows. Toggle the
automatic updates setting within Windows.
Webroot offers several comprehensive Internet security solutions for consumers including Webroot® AntiVirus with Spy Sweeper®, and Webroot Internet Security Essentials. For more information about these and other products, please visit http://www.webroot.com/En_US/consumer.html.
About the Research
Between February and March 2010, Webroot sponsored an online survey of Internet users in the United States and the United Kingdom. The panel management company e-Rewards invited panel members who own a PC or laptop, have an Internet connection at home, and spend at least one hour per week online at home to participate in the study. With a total of 1,136 respondents, the margin of error is +/- 2.9 percentage points at the 95 percent confidence level. To view the complete results visit: http://www.slideshare.net/Webroot/webroot-research-one-year-later-social-netwo rkers-are-savvier-about-keeping-information-private-but-still-take-risks.
About Webroot
Webroot, a Boulder, Colorado-based company provides industry-leading security solutions to consumers, enterprises and small to medium-sized businesses worldwide. Webroot delivers a comprehensive range of cloud-based security services to business customers that encompass Web security, email security, email archiving, as well as endpoint protection. For more information visit http://www.webroot.com/ or call 800.772.9383.
Webroot Threat Blog: http://blog.webroot.com/. Follow Webroot on Twitter: http://twitter.com/webroot.
©2010 Webroot Software, Inc. All rights reserved. Webroot and Spy Sweeper are registered trademarks or trademarks of Webroot Software, Inc. in the United States and other countries. All other trademarks are properties of their respective owners.
(1) Source: Facebook Statistics: http://www.facebook.com/press/info.php?statistics
(2) Source: Experian Hitwise Analyst Blog, http://weblogs.hitwise.com/heather-dougherty/2010/03/facebook_reaches_top_rank ing_i.html
(3) Source: "Twitter update newsletter by Biz Stone reports 1,500 percent growth," March 2, 2010, San Francisco Chronicle Online, http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/abraham/detail??blogid=95&entry_id=58321
Source: Webroot
CONTACT: Aimee Eichelberger of Borders+Gratehouse, +1-415-963-4174, ext.
15, Aimee(at) bordersgratehouse.com, for Webroot
Web Site: Webroot
Tuesday, March 30, 2010
African NGOs call for Competitive Elections for the UN Human Rights Council
30 Mar 2010 14:20 Africa/Lagos
African NGOs call for Competitive Elections for the UN Human Rights Council
KAMPALA, March 30, 2010/African Press Organization (APO)/ -- A group of African NGOs from throughout the continent today urged African governments to support competition among African states for seats on the United Nations Human Rights Council. Elections to the council will be held in the UN General Assembly on May 13, 2010.
The African NGOs expressed concern that a closed meeting of a small committee of the African Union officially endorsed two states – Libya and Mauritania – and that Africa may have only four candidates running for the four African seats to be filled this year. The politicized nature of the process was illustrated by the fact that in recent years countries with admirable human rights records have been discouraged from running for the Council.
The NGOs urged that at least five African states come forward to run for the four available seats, and that the candidates be evaluated and elected based on their commitments to promoting human rights, rather than power politics, reciprocal agreements, and vote-trading.
UN General Assembly resolution 60/251, which established the Human Rights Council, envisioned elections in which states would compete for membership based on their commitments to promoting human rights, and that elected members would “uphold the highest standards of human rights.” The NGOs applauded Africa for having an open slate last year with six states competing for five seats, and urged that similar competition be encouraged this year.
“Rather than deciding who will sit on the Human Rights Council behind closed doors, African states should support a transparent and competitive process,” said Hassan Shire Sheikh, Executive Director of the East and Horn of Africa Human Rights Defenders Project. “Africa is best served by having the most qualified and committed states fill its slots on the council.”
In the letter, the African NGOs urged their leaders to:
Call for greater transparency and representation within the selection process of candidates in the AU Ministerial Committee on African Candidatures within the International System;
Encourage the African group to ensure competitive elections by putting forward at least five candidates for the forthcoming May 2010 elections;
Closely monitor the human rights records of states nominated to run; and
Ensure that states are elected based on an objective assessment of the state's commitment to and promotion of human rights rather than the result of power politics, reciprocal agreements, and vote trading.
A copy of the letter is attached.
March 26, 2010
To: African Heads of State
Re: May 2010 UN Human Rights Council elections
Your Excellency,
As a diverse group of African human rights organizations engaged with the UN Human Rights Council (Council) in Geneva we urge you to seize the opportunity of the forthcoming May 2010 Council elections to ensure that the African group encourages the states from our continent with a human rights record of the ‘highest standard' to run for election, in line with the spirit of UN General Assembly Resolution 60/251 creating the Council.
We would like to start off by applauding the competitive elections among the African candidates during last year's Council election and would like to encourage the African group to support competition for the elections this year.
We are however writing to express our concern about several recent and established procedures within the selection process that risk to undermine the level of competition and transparency of elections within the African group.
First of all, we are concerned that the nomination of candidates within the African Union (AU) Ministerial Committee on African Candidatures within the International System, a body in which a limited number of states are represented, prevents certain states from having their voices heard and heightens the risk of power politics, reciprocal agreements, and vote trading. In fact, in past years, countries from our continent whose human rights records should be applauded and whose membership would be a valuable addition to the Council have been discouraged from seeking a seat as a result of considerations unrelated to their commitment to human rights promotion.
We would also like to express our concern by the recent decision of the AU Executive Council to only officially endorse two candidates, notably Libya and Mauritania, for this year's election: four African seats are up for re-election in May and the elections are now just over a month away. One of the key aims of the Council was to improve the membership of the main UN human rights mechanisms, notably by ensuring that Member States are able to elect members based on the “contribution of candidates to the promotion and protection of human rights”; ensuring a competitive slate is therefore crucial.
We therefore urge you:
To call for greater transparency and representation within the selection process of candidates in the AU Ministerial Committee on African Candidatures within the International System;
To encourage the African group to ensure competitive elections by selecting in a fair and transparent manner at least five candidates for the forthcoming May 2010 elections;
To closely monitor the human rights records of states nominated to run; and
To ensure that states are elected based on an objective assessment of the state's commitment to and promotion of human rights rather than the result of power politics, reciprocal agreements, and vote trading.
Commitment by the African group to the Council election process can not only help to enhance the effectiveness and credibility of the Council, but it can also shape the future of human rights in Africa by drawing international attention to Africa's specific concerns and by giving countries within the region who serve as proponents of human rights both the standing and space they deserve.
Many thanks for giving importance to this selection.
Sincerely,
Hassan Shire Sheikh
Executive Director
East and Horn of Africa Human Rights Defenders Project (EHAHRDP), Uganda
Roshnee Narrandes
Chairperson
Southern African Human Rights Defenders Trust (SAHRDT)
Pacifique Nininahazwe
President
Forum for the Re-enforcement of Civil Society (FORSC)
Moataz El Fegiery
Executive Director
Source: Human Right Watch (HRW)
African NGOs call for Competitive Elections for the UN Human Rights Council
KAMPALA, March 30, 2010/African Press Organization (APO)/ -- A group of African NGOs from throughout the continent today urged African governments to support competition among African states for seats on the United Nations Human Rights Council. Elections to the council will be held in the UN General Assembly on May 13, 2010.
The African NGOs expressed concern that a closed meeting of a small committee of the African Union officially endorsed two states – Libya and Mauritania – and that Africa may have only four candidates running for the four African seats to be filled this year. The politicized nature of the process was illustrated by the fact that in recent years countries with admirable human rights records have been discouraged from running for the Council.
The NGOs urged that at least five African states come forward to run for the four available seats, and that the candidates be evaluated and elected based on their commitments to promoting human rights, rather than power politics, reciprocal agreements, and vote-trading.
UN General Assembly resolution 60/251, which established the Human Rights Council, envisioned elections in which states would compete for membership based on their commitments to promoting human rights, and that elected members would “uphold the highest standards of human rights.” The NGOs applauded Africa for having an open slate last year with six states competing for five seats, and urged that similar competition be encouraged this year.
“Rather than deciding who will sit on the Human Rights Council behind closed doors, African states should support a transparent and competitive process,” said Hassan Shire Sheikh, Executive Director of the East and Horn of Africa Human Rights Defenders Project. “Africa is best served by having the most qualified and committed states fill its slots on the council.”
In the letter, the African NGOs urged their leaders to:
Call for greater transparency and representation within the selection process of candidates in the AU Ministerial Committee on African Candidatures within the International System;
Encourage the African group to ensure competitive elections by putting forward at least five candidates for the forthcoming May 2010 elections;
Closely monitor the human rights records of states nominated to run; and
Ensure that states are elected based on an objective assessment of the state's commitment to and promotion of human rights rather than the result of power politics, reciprocal agreements, and vote trading.
A copy of the letter is attached.
March 26, 2010
To: African Heads of State
Re: May 2010 UN Human Rights Council elections
Your Excellency,
As a diverse group of African human rights organizations engaged with the UN Human Rights Council (Council) in Geneva we urge you to seize the opportunity of the forthcoming May 2010 Council elections to ensure that the African group encourages the states from our continent with a human rights record of the ‘highest standard' to run for election, in line with the spirit of UN General Assembly Resolution 60/251 creating the Council.
We would like to start off by applauding the competitive elections among the African candidates during last year's Council election and would like to encourage the African group to support competition for the elections this year.
We are however writing to express our concern about several recent and established procedures within the selection process that risk to undermine the level of competition and transparency of elections within the African group.
First of all, we are concerned that the nomination of candidates within the African Union (AU) Ministerial Committee on African Candidatures within the International System, a body in which a limited number of states are represented, prevents certain states from having their voices heard and heightens the risk of power politics, reciprocal agreements, and vote trading. In fact, in past years, countries from our continent whose human rights records should be applauded and whose membership would be a valuable addition to the Council have been discouraged from seeking a seat as a result of considerations unrelated to their commitment to human rights promotion.
We would also like to express our concern by the recent decision of the AU Executive Council to only officially endorse two candidates, notably Libya and Mauritania, for this year's election: four African seats are up for re-election in May and the elections are now just over a month away. One of the key aims of the Council was to improve the membership of the main UN human rights mechanisms, notably by ensuring that Member States are able to elect members based on the “contribution of candidates to the promotion and protection of human rights”; ensuring a competitive slate is therefore crucial.
We therefore urge you:
To call for greater transparency and representation within the selection process of candidates in the AU Ministerial Committee on African Candidatures within the International System;
To encourage the African group to ensure competitive elections by selecting in a fair and transparent manner at least five candidates for the forthcoming May 2010 elections;
To closely monitor the human rights records of states nominated to run; and
To ensure that states are elected based on an objective assessment of the state's commitment to and promotion of human rights rather than the result of power politics, reciprocal agreements, and vote trading.
Commitment by the African group to the Council election process can not only help to enhance the effectiveness and credibility of the Council, but it can also shape the future of human rights in Africa by drawing international attention to Africa's specific concerns and by giving countries within the region who serve as proponents of human rights both the standing and space they deserve.
Many thanks for giving importance to this selection.
Sincerely,
Hassan Shire Sheikh
Executive Director
East and Horn of Africa Human Rights Defenders Project (EHAHRDP), Uganda
Roshnee Narrandes
Chairperson
Southern African Human Rights Defenders Trust (SAHRDT)
Pacifique Nininahazwe
President
Forum for the Re-enforcement of Civil Society (FORSC)
Moataz El Fegiery
Executive Director
Source: Human Right Watch (HRW)
Chinua Achebe: "Acting President Goodluck Jonathan is Weak"
Prof. Chinua Achebe
The most lionized African writer, Prof. Chinua Achebe, 79, has said that there seems to be no legitimate government in Nigeria, the most populous country in Africa and where his literary genius sprouted and blossomed until an auto-accident on 22 March 1990 left him paralyzed; and disappointment in Nigerian political leaders made him to relocate to the United States of America, where he has been teaching at the David and Marianna Fisher University and as a Professor of Africana Studies at Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island, United States.
Chinua Achebe said Acting President Goodluck Jonathan is weak in his reaction to the horrifying massacres of native Christians in Plateau state and blamed the spread of Islamic extremism for the recurrent ethno-religious crisis in Jos and other parts of the middle belt and northern Nigeria.
“He suddenly doesn’t seem to bring good luck. He is weak. A strong man in any position in Nigeria should be horrified by what happened in Jos. Shamed is what we should feel. We don’t seem to have any government. People don’t know where their president — before the present acting president — where he went or where he is,” Achebe said.
He was speaking in an interview he granted Deborah Solomon for The New York Times on his historic Things Fall Apart which has been translated into over 40 different languages worldwide and sold over 8 million copies.
"That would be possible. I’m not grumbling; I have done well. But don’t imagine I’m a millionaire," Achebe said.
Prof. Achebe also spoke on the Nigerian Al-Qaeda underwear bomber, Abdul Farouk Abdulmutallab, saying what he attempted was insane!
~ By Ekenyerengozi Michael Chima
Read Books by Chinua Achebe:
The Education of a British-Protected Child: Essays
The African Trilogy: Things Fall Apart, No Longer at Ease, and Arrow of God (Everyman's Library (Cloth))
No Longer at Ease by Chinua Achebe (the author of Things Fall Apart)
Monday, March 29, 2010
Nearly 25 Percent of Hispanic Youth Aged 12 to 20 Drank Alcohol in the Past Month
17:21 29 Mar 2010, Africa/Lagos time
National Survey Shows that Nearly 25 Percent of Hispanic Youth Aged 12 to 20 Drank Alcohol in the Past Month
More than a quarter of youth aged 12-20 (27.6 percent) drank alcohol in the past month, according to a survey by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). The study shows that the underage drinking rates were as high as 40...
SAMHSA and Ad Council Launch National Underage Drinking Prevention Campaign
Haga clic aquí para ver este comunicado de prensa en Español.
Rockville, MD, March 25, 2010 /PRNewswire/ — More than a quarter of youth aged 12-20 (27.6 percent) drank alcohol in the past month, according to a survey by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). The study shows that the underage drinking rates were as high as 40 percent in some states such as North Dakota and Vermont.
In a major effort to combat the epidemic of underage drinking, SAMHSA and the Ad Council today launched a new series of national public service advertisements to encourage parents to talk to their children about drinking alcohol at an early age. The campaign and study are being released in conjunction with Alcohol Awareness Month (April) and as part of the Surgeon General’s “Call to Action to Prevent and Reduce Underage Drinking.” The PSAs are being distributed to media outlets throughout the country and will also be available on line at the campaign’s online fulfillment.
Alcohol is the most widely used substance of abuse among America’s youth. Alcohol contributes to the three leading causes of death among 12-20-year-olds (unintentional injury, homicide and suicide). And research shows that those who start drinking before age 15 are six times more likely to have alcohol problems as adults than those who start drinking at age 21 or older.
The study also reveals that nationwide, approximately 8.6 percent of past-month drinkers aged 12-20 purchased their own alcohol the last time they drank. The rates were among the highest in Louisiana and the District of Columbia (18.8 percent) and among the lowest in Alaska (3.1 percent) and New Mexico (3.7 percent).
The data were drawn from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), using combined 2006-2008 data in estimates of past month alcohol use and self-purchase of alcohol among persons aged 12-20. The report will be available at: http://oas.samhsa.gov/2k10/180/SR180UADhtml.pdf
“Prevention is the number one priority of SAMHSA, and reducing underage drinking is a key part of that effort. Underage drinking is a national crisis putting the lives of millions of Americans at risk as well as the futures of many of our youth,” said SAMHSA Administrator Pamela S. Hyde, J.D. “The national educational campaign SAMHSA is undertaking with the Ad Council aims at bringing to bear the most effective weapon against underage drinking – conversations between parents and their children.”
Created by ad agency Deutsch Inc. through the Ad Council, the new PSAs aim to reach parents of children ages 11-15, with an emphasis on parents of middle school children who have not yet started drinking. The television, radio, magazine, newspaper and Internet ads are designed to reduce and delay the onset of underage drinking by increasing communication between parents and youth. The ads encourage parents to talk early, talk often and get others involved.
“Despite its prevalence and serious consequences, many parents underestimate the extent to which their children use alcohol and even consider it inevitable,” said Peggy Conlon, president & CEO of The Advertising Council. “These new compelling ads and interactive components will continue to build on our efforts to create a greater sense of urgency for parents and encourage them to talk to their children early and often about the dangers of alcohol.”
The PSA campaign includes resources for parents that illustrate the short and long-term consequences of underage drinking and for tips on talking with their kids about alcohol. The site features an action plan that parents can personalize for their children to help start the conversation and sharable resources to send to family members, peers, and other adult influencers on their child’s decision to drink. In an effort to further the reach of the campaign to parents online, a social media program will also kick off this week, in cooperation with Nickelodeon’s Parents Connect (www.ParentsConnect.com).
“The statistics show that in large and growing numbers, our underage kids, yours and mine, real kids in the real world are drinking,” said Val DiFebo, CEO of Deutsch NY, a subsidiary of Deutsch, Inc., and Ad Council Campaign Review Committee member. “Our mission is to get parents to consider that it could be their kid, and encourage open, ongoing dialogues. We are proud to be part of this important messaging to help raise awareness, and influence behavior to help prevent underage drinking.”
In addition to these ads, SAMHSA and the Ad Council are launching culturally relevant PSAs designed specifically to reach parents in the Hispanic, Chinese and American Indian communities.
The Ad Council and SAMHSA first launched the national Underage Drinking Prevention campaign in November 2005. According to the Ad Council’s tracking study, since the launch, there has been a significant increase in the number of parents who are extremely concerned about underage drinking with their level of concern now comparable to issues, including sex, drug use and academic performance.
SAMHSA is a public health agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The agency is responsible for improving the accountability, capacity and effectiveness of the nation’s substance abuse prevention, addictions, treatment and mental health services delivery system. SAMHSA can be reached at www.samhsa.gov.
The Advertising Council is a private, non-profit organization that has been the largest producer of PSAs in the nation since 1942. To learn more about the Ad Council and its campaigns, visit www.adcouncil.org.
Deutsch Inc. (www.deutschinc.com) is a multi-disciplinary marketing communications agency.
Media Contacts:
SAMHSA Press Office
240-276-2130
Ad Council Press Office
news@adcouncil.org
Top 100 Hospitals in the United States of America
Africa/Lagos
Thomson Reuters Announces 100 Top Hospitals Award Winners
Twenty-three Hospitals Are Named Everest Award Winners for Fastest Improvement and Top Performance
ANN ARBOR, Mich., March 29 /PRNewswire/ -- Thomson Reuters today released its annual study identifying the 100 top U.S. hospitals based on their overall organizational performance.
The Thomson Reuters 100 Top Hospitals®: National Benchmarks study evaluates performance in 10 areas: mortality, medical complications, patient safety, average length of stay, expenses, profitability, patient satisfaction, adherence to clinical standards of care, and post-discharge mortality and readmission rates for acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and pneumonia. The study has been conducted annually since 1993.
"This year's study magnified the value that 100 Top Hospital award winners provide to their communities. Even during the economic downturn, the 100 Top Hospitals maintained a profit from operations while raising the bar for clinical quality and patient satisfaction," said Jean Chenoweth, senior vice president for performance improvement and 100 Top Hospitals programs at Thomson Reuters. "The insistence of these hospitals' leaders -- their boards, executive teams and medical staffs -- on overall excellence makes the difference."
For the second year, Thomson Reuters also is recognizing the 100 Top Hospitals Everest Award winners -- those hospitals among the 100 winners that delivered the greatest rate of improvement over a five-year period. This year, there are 23 Everest award winners.
To conduct the 100 Top Hospitals study, Thomson Reuters researchers evaluated 2,926 short-term, acute care, non-federal hospitals. They used public information -- Medicare cost reports, Medicare Provider Analysis and Review (MedPAR) data, and core measures and patient satisfaction data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Hospital Compare data set.
If all Medicare inpatients received the same level of care as those treated in these 100 Top Hospitals award winners:
-- More than 98,000 additional patients would survive each year.
-- More than 197,000 patient complications would be avoided annually.
-- Expenses would decline by an aggregate $5.5 billion a year.
-- The average patient stay would decrease by nearly half a day.
If the same standards were applied to all inpatients, the impact would be even greater.
Here are the winning hospitals, by category, with the Everest award winners in bold:
Major Teaching Hospitals
University Medical Center--Tucson, AZ
UC San Diego Medical Center - Hillcrest--San Diego, CA
Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center--Chicago, IL
Northwestern Memorial Hospital--Chicago, IL
Rush University Medical Center--Chicago, IL
NorthShore University HealthSystem--Evanston, IL
Advocate Lutheran General Hospital--Park Ridge, IL
Ochsner Medical Center--New Orleans, LA
Providence Hospital and Medical Center--Southfield, MI
Mayo Clinic - Rochester Methodist Hospital--Rochester, MN
University Hospitals Case Medical Center--Cleveland, OH
Doctors Hospital--Columbus, OH
Geisinger Medical Center--Danville, PA
Vanderbilt University Medical Center--Nashville, TN
Scott and White Memorial Hospital--Temple, TX
Teaching Hospitals (200 or more acute-care beds)
Scripps Green Hospital--La Jolla, CA
Rose Medical Center--Denver, CO
Cleveland Clinic Florida--Weston, FL
St. Luke's Boise Medical Center--Boise, ID
St. Luke's Hospital--Cedar Rapids, IA
Riverside Medical Center--Kankakee, IL
St. Vincent Indianapolis Hospital--Indianapolis, IN
St. Elizabeth Medical Center--Edgewood, KY
Trover Health System--Madisonville, KY
St. Joseph Mercy Hospital--Ann Arbor, MI
Spectrum Health Hospital Group--Grand Rapids, MI
Bronson Methodist Hospital--Kalamazoo, MI
Munson Medical Center--Traverse City, MI
St. Cloud Hospital--St. Cloud, MN
Alegent Health Bergan Mercy Medical Center--Omaha, NE
Aultman Hospital--Canton, OH
Riverside Methodist Hospital--Columbus, OH
Hamot Medical Center--Erie, PA
Robert Packer Hospital--Sayre, PA
Avera McKennan Hospital & University Health Center--Sioux Falls, SD
Sanford USD Medical Center--Sioux Falls, SD
Baptist Hospital--Nashville, TN
McKay-Dee Hospital Center--Ogden, UT
Gundersen Lutheran Health System--La Crosse, WI
Meriter Hospital--Madison, WI
Large Community Hospitals (250 or more acute-care beds)
Scottsdale Healthcare Shea--Scottsdale, AZ
Saddleback Memorial Medical Center--Laguna Hills, CA
Memorial Hospital West--Pembroke Pines, FL
Martin Memorial Medical Center--Stuart, FL
Venice Regional Medical Center--Venice, FL
Northeast Georgia Medical Center--Gainesville, GA
Silver Cross Hospital--Joliet, IL
Central DuPage Hospital--Winfield, IL
Community Hospital --Munster, IN
Allegiance Health--Jackson, MI
Boone Hospital Center--Columbia, MO
Missouri Baptist Medical Center--St. Louis, MO
Gaston Memorial Hospital--Gastonia, NC
Memorial Health Care System--Chattanooga, TN
Maury Regional Medical Center--Columbia, TN
Saint Thomas Hospital--Nashville, TN
St. David's Medical Center--Austin, TX
Doctors Hospital at Renaissance--Edinburg, TX
Memorial Hermann Memorial City Medical Center--Houston, TX
Trinity Mother Frances Hospital --Tyler, TX
Medium Community Hospitals (100-249 acute-care beds)
Baptist Medical Center East--Montgomery, AL
Montclair Hospital Medical Center--Montclair, CA
Memorial Hospital Miramar--Miramar, FL
Piedmont Fayette Hospital--Fayetteville, GA
St. Vincent Carmel Hospital--Carmel, IN
St. Francis Hospital-Indianapolis--Indianapolis, IN
Jackson Purchase Medical Center--Mayfield, KY
Minden Medical Center--Minden, LA
Holland Hospital--Holland, MI
Mercy Hospital Clermont--Batavia, OH
Southwest General Health Center--Middleburg Heights, OH
Wooster Community Hospital--Wooster, OH
St. Elizabeth Boardman Health Center--Youngstown, OH
DuBois Regional Medical Center--DuBois, PA
Skyline Medical Center--Nashville, TN
Memorial Hermann Katy Hospital--Katy, TX
Dixie Regional Medical Center--St. George, UT
Memorial Regional Medical Center--Mechanicsville, VA
Aurora BayCare Medical Center--Green Bay, WI
Aurora Sheboygan Memorial Medical Center--Sheboygan, WI
Small Community Hospitals (25-99 acute care beds)
Evergreen Medical Center--Evergreen, AL
Payson Regional Medical Center--Payson, AZ
St. Elizabeth Community Hospital--Red Bluff, CA
Desert Valley Hospital--Victorville, CA
Parkview Huntington Hospital--Huntington, IN
Major Hospital--Shelbyville, IN
The Finley Hospital--Dubuque, IA
Chelsea Community Hospital--Chelsea, MI
St. Joseph Mercy Livingston Hospital--Howell, MI
St. Joseph Mercy Saline Hospital--Saline, MI
St. Joseph Hospital--Tawas City, MI
Buffalo Hospital--Buffalo, MN
Woodwinds Health Campus--Woodbury, MN
Northeast Regional Medical Center--Kirksville, MO
Barnes-Jewish St. Peters Hospital--St. Peters, MO
St. Mary's Jefferson Memorial Hospital--Jefferson City, TN
StoneCrest Medical Center--Smyrna, TN
Connally Memorial Medical Center--Floresville, TX
Lake Whitney Medical Center--Whitney, TX
American Fork Hospital--American Fork, UT
About Thomson Reuters
Thomson Reuters is the world's leading source of intelligent information for businesses and professionals. We combine industry expertise with innovative technology to deliver critical information to leading decision makers in the financial, legal, tax and accounting, healthcare and science and media markets, powered by the world's most trusted news organization. With headquarters in New York and major operations in London and Eagan, Minnesota, Thomson Reuters employs more than 50,000 people and operates in over 100 countries. Thomson Reuters shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX: TRI) and New York Stock Exchange (NYSE:TRI) . For more information, go to www.thomsonreuters.com.
Source: Thomson Reuters
CONTACT: David Wilkins, +1-734-913-3397,
david.wilkins@thomsonreuters.com
Web Site: Thomson Reuters
Thomson Reuters Announces 100 Top Hospitals Award Winners
Twenty-three Hospitals Are Named Everest Award Winners for Fastest Improvement and Top Performance
ANN ARBOR, Mich., March 29 /PRNewswire/ -- Thomson Reuters today released its annual study identifying the 100 top U.S. hospitals based on their overall organizational performance.
The Thomson Reuters 100 Top Hospitals®: National Benchmarks study evaluates performance in 10 areas: mortality, medical complications, patient safety, average length of stay, expenses, profitability, patient satisfaction, adherence to clinical standards of care, and post-discharge mortality and readmission rates for acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and pneumonia. The study has been conducted annually since 1993.
"This year's study magnified the value that 100 Top Hospital award winners provide to their communities. Even during the economic downturn, the 100 Top Hospitals maintained a profit from operations while raising the bar for clinical quality and patient satisfaction," said Jean Chenoweth, senior vice president for performance improvement and 100 Top Hospitals programs at Thomson Reuters. "The insistence of these hospitals' leaders -- their boards, executive teams and medical staffs -- on overall excellence makes the difference."
For the second year, Thomson Reuters also is recognizing the 100 Top Hospitals Everest Award winners -- those hospitals among the 100 winners that delivered the greatest rate of improvement over a five-year period. This year, there are 23 Everest award winners.
To conduct the 100 Top Hospitals study, Thomson Reuters researchers evaluated 2,926 short-term, acute care, non-federal hospitals. They used public information -- Medicare cost reports, Medicare Provider Analysis and Review (MedPAR) data, and core measures and patient satisfaction data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Hospital Compare data set.
If all Medicare inpatients received the same level of care as those treated in these 100 Top Hospitals award winners:
-- More than 98,000 additional patients would survive each year.
-- More than 197,000 patient complications would be avoided annually.
-- Expenses would decline by an aggregate $5.5 billion a year.
-- The average patient stay would decrease by nearly half a day.
If the same standards were applied to all inpatients, the impact would be even greater.
Here are the winning hospitals, by category, with the Everest award winners in bold:
Major Teaching Hospitals
University Medical Center--Tucson, AZ
UC San Diego Medical Center - Hillcrest--San Diego, CA
Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center--Chicago, IL
Northwestern Memorial Hospital--Chicago, IL
Rush University Medical Center--Chicago, IL
NorthShore University HealthSystem--Evanston, IL
Advocate Lutheran General Hospital--Park Ridge, IL
Ochsner Medical Center--New Orleans, LA
Providence Hospital and Medical Center--Southfield, MI
Mayo Clinic - Rochester Methodist Hospital--Rochester, MN
University Hospitals Case Medical Center--Cleveland, OH
Doctors Hospital--Columbus, OH
Geisinger Medical Center--Danville, PA
Vanderbilt University Medical Center--Nashville, TN
Scott and White Memorial Hospital--Temple, TX
Teaching Hospitals (200 or more acute-care beds)
Scripps Green Hospital--La Jolla, CA
Rose Medical Center--Denver, CO
Cleveland Clinic Florida--Weston, FL
St. Luke's Boise Medical Center--Boise, ID
St. Luke's Hospital--Cedar Rapids, IA
Riverside Medical Center--Kankakee, IL
St. Vincent Indianapolis Hospital--Indianapolis, IN
St. Elizabeth Medical Center--Edgewood, KY
Trover Health System--Madisonville, KY
St. Joseph Mercy Hospital--Ann Arbor, MI
Spectrum Health Hospital Group--Grand Rapids, MI
Bronson Methodist Hospital--Kalamazoo, MI
Munson Medical Center--Traverse City, MI
St. Cloud Hospital--St. Cloud, MN
Alegent Health Bergan Mercy Medical Center--Omaha, NE
Aultman Hospital--Canton, OH
Riverside Methodist Hospital--Columbus, OH
Hamot Medical Center--Erie, PA
Robert Packer Hospital--Sayre, PA
Avera McKennan Hospital & University Health Center--Sioux Falls, SD
Sanford USD Medical Center--Sioux Falls, SD
Baptist Hospital--Nashville, TN
McKay-Dee Hospital Center--Ogden, UT
Gundersen Lutheran Health System--La Crosse, WI
Meriter Hospital--Madison, WI
Large Community Hospitals (250 or more acute-care beds)
Scottsdale Healthcare Shea--Scottsdale, AZ
Saddleback Memorial Medical Center--Laguna Hills, CA
Memorial Hospital West--Pembroke Pines, FL
Martin Memorial Medical Center--Stuart, FL
Venice Regional Medical Center--Venice, FL
Northeast Georgia Medical Center--Gainesville, GA
Silver Cross Hospital--Joliet, IL
Central DuPage Hospital--Winfield, IL
Community Hospital --Munster, IN
Allegiance Health--Jackson, MI
Boone Hospital Center--Columbia, MO
Missouri Baptist Medical Center--St. Louis, MO
Gaston Memorial Hospital--Gastonia, NC
Memorial Health Care System--Chattanooga, TN
Maury Regional Medical Center--Columbia, TN
Saint Thomas Hospital--Nashville, TN
St. David's Medical Center--Austin, TX
Doctors Hospital at Renaissance--Edinburg, TX
Memorial Hermann Memorial City Medical Center--Houston, TX
Trinity Mother Frances Hospital --Tyler, TX
Medium Community Hospitals (100-249 acute-care beds)
Baptist Medical Center East--Montgomery, AL
Montclair Hospital Medical Center--Montclair, CA
Memorial Hospital Miramar--Miramar, FL
Piedmont Fayette Hospital--Fayetteville, GA
St. Vincent Carmel Hospital--Carmel, IN
St. Francis Hospital-Indianapolis--Indianapolis, IN
Jackson Purchase Medical Center--Mayfield, KY
Minden Medical Center--Minden, LA
Holland Hospital--Holland, MI
Mercy Hospital Clermont--Batavia, OH
Southwest General Health Center--Middleburg Heights, OH
Wooster Community Hospital--Wooster, OH
St. Elizabeth Boardman Health Center--Youngstown, OH
DuBois Regional Medical Center--DuBois, PA
Skyline Medical Center--Nashville, TN
Memorial Hermann Katy Hospital--Katy, TX
Dixie Regional Medical Center--St. George, UT
Memorial Regional Medical Center--Mechanicsville, VA
Aurora BayCare Medical Center--Green Bay, WI
Aurora Sheboygan Memorial Medical Center--Sheboygan, WI
Small Community Hospitals (25-99 acute care beds)
Evergreen Medical Center--Evergreen, AL
Payson Regional Medical Center--Payson, AZ
St. Elizabeth Community Hospital--Red Bluff, CA
Desert Valley Hospital--Victorville, CA
Parkview Huntington Hospital--Huntington, IN
Major Hospital--Shelbyville, IN
The Finley Hospital--Dubuque, IA
Chelsea Community Hospital--Chelsea, MI
St. Joseph Mercy Livingston Hospital--Howell, MI
St. Joseph Mercy Saline Hospital--Saline, MI
St. Joseph Hospital--Tawas City, MI
Buffalo Hospital--Buffalo, MN
Woodwinds Health Campus--Woodbury, MN
Northeast Regional Medical Center--Kirksville, MO
Barnes-Jewish St. Peters Hospital--St. Peters, MO
St. Mary's Jefferson Memorial Hospital--Jefferson City, TN
StoneCrest Medical Center--Smyrna, TN
Connally Memorial Medical Center--Floresville, TX
Lake Whitney Medical Center--Whitney, TX
American Fork Hospital--American Fork, UT
About Thomson Reuters
Thomson Reuters is the world's leading source of intelligent information for businesses and professionals. We combine industry expertise with innovative technology to deliver critical information to leading decision makers in the financial, legal, tax and accounting, healthcare and science and media markets, powered by the world's most trusted news organization. With headquarters in New York and major operations in London and Eagan, Minnesota, Thomson Reuters employs more than 50,000 people and operates in over 100 countries. Thomson Reuters shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX: TRI) and New York Stock Exchange (NYSE:TRI) . For more information, go to www.thomsonreuters.com.
Source: Thomson Reuters
CONTACT: David Wilkins, +1-734-913-3397,
david.wilkins@thomsonreuters.com
Web Site: Thomson Reuters
CAIR Seeks Info on Militia Threats to Muslim Groups
29 Mar 2010 04:01 Africa/Lagos
CAIR Seeks Info on Militia Threats to Muslim Groups
FBI reportedly raids militia after threats of violence against Islamic organizations
WASHINGTON, March 28 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- A prominent national Muslim civil rights and advocacy organization tonight called on federal law enforcement authorities to release more information about possible threats of violence against American Muslims by a militia group raided this weekend in several states.
[NOTE TO MEDIA PROFESSIONALS: Charges are expected to be unsealed in federal court in Detroit on Monday. If the reported threats to Islamic organizations are confirmed, CAIR will hold a news conference on the issue later on Monday in Washington, D.C. CONTACT: CAIR National Communications Director Ibrahim Hooper, 202-744-7726, E-Mail: ihooper@cair.com]
The Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) said at least seven members of a Christian militia group have been arrested in FBI-led Joint Terrorism Task Force raids and investigations in Michigan, Ohio, Illinois, and Indiana. According to media reports, the "Hutaree" militia was targeted after its members made threats of violence against Islamic organizations.
SEE: Seven Arrested in FBI Raids Linked to Christian Militia Group (Detroit News)
http://tinyurl.com/detnewsmilitia
FBI Arrests 7 with Ties to Christian Militia (CBS)
http://cbs5.com/national/hutaree.militia.group.2.1595616.html
"Given the recent sharp spike CAIR offices nationwide have observed in anti-Islam rhetoric, it would not be surprising that an extremist group would seek to turn that bigoted rhetoric into violent actions," said CAIR National Executive Director Nihad Awad. "At this stage, we are seeking more information about possible threats to American Muslim organizations and are urging the offices of CAIR and other Islamic institutions nationwide to take appropriate security precautions."
He added that just last week, CAIR called on Republican leaders to repudiate racist taunts by tea party opponents of health care reform targeting a Muslim congressman and another African-American lawmaker on Capitol Hill.
SEE: Muslim Congressman Called 'N**ger' by Tea Party Protesters
http://tinyurl.com/carsonnword
Awad also noted that CAIR recently expressed concern about the reported rise in the number of anti-government and anti-immigrant extremist groups during the past year.
SEE: CAIR Concerned About Reported Rise in Militias, 'Patriot' Groups
http://tinyurl.com/riseinmilitias
CAIR is urging American Muslim individuals and institutions to review advice on security procedures contained in its "Muslim Community Safety Kit."
SEE: Muslim Community Safety Kit
http://www.cair.com/ActionCenter/CommunityToolKit.aspx
Become a Fan of CAIR on Facebook
http://www.facebook.com/pages/CAIR/42590232694
Subscribe to CAIR's E-Mail List
http://tinyurl.com/cairsubscribe
CAIR is America's largest Muslim civil liberties and advocacy organization. Its mission is to enhance the understanding of Islam, encourage dialogue, protect civil liberties, empower American Muslims, and build coalitions that promote justice and mutual understanding.
CONTACT: CAIR National Communications Director Ibrahim Hooper, 202-744-7726, E-Mail: ihooper@cair.com; CAIR-MI Executive Director Dawud Walid, 248-842-1418, E-Mail: dwalid@cair.com; CAIR-Chicago Executive Director Ahmed Rehab, 202-870-0166, E-mail: arehab@cair.com; CAIR-Cleveland Executive Director Julia Shearson, 216-440-2247, E-Mail: jshearson@cair.com; CAIR Communications Coordinator Amina Rubin, 202-488-8787, 202-341-4171, E-Mail: arubin@cair.com
Source: Council on American-Islamic Relations
CONTACT: CAIR National Communications Director Ibrahim Hooper,
+1-202-744-7726, ihooper@cair.com; CAIR-MI Executive Director Dawud Walid,
+1-248-842-1418, dwalid@cair.com; CAIR-Chicago Executive Director Ahmed Rehab,
+1-202-870-0166, arehab@cair.com; CAIR-Cleveland Executive Director Julia
Shearson, +1-216-440-2247, jshearson@cair.com; CAIR Communications Coordinator
Amina Rubin, +1-202-488-8787, +1-202-341-4171, arubin@cair.com
Web Site: Council on American-Islamic Relations
CAIR Seeks Info on Militia Threats to Muslim Groups
FBI reportedly raids militia after threats of violence against Islamic organizations
WASHINGTON, March 28 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- A prominent national Muslim civil rights and advocacy organization tonight called on federal law enforcement authorities to release more information about possible threats of violence against American Muslims by a militia group raided this weekend in several states.
[NOTE TO MEDIA PROFESSIONALS: Charges are expected to be unsealed in federal court in Detroit on Monday. If the reported threats to Islamic organizations are confirmed, CAIR will hold a news conference on the issue later on Monday in Washington, D.C. CONTACT: CAIR National Communications Director Ibrahim Hooper, 202-744-7726, E-Mail: ihooper@cair.com]
The Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) said at least seven members of a Christian militia group have been arrested in FBI-led Joint Terrorism Task Force raids and investigations in Michigan, Ohio, Illinois, and Indiana. According to media reports, the "Hutaree" militia was targeted after its members made threats of violence against Islamic organizations.
SEE: Seven Arrested in FBI Raids Linked to Christian Militia Group (Detroit News)
http://tinyurl.com/detnewsmilitia
FBI Arrests 7 with Ties to Christian Militia (CBS)
http://cbs5.com/national/hutaree.militia.group.2.1595616.html
"Given the recent sharp spike CAIR offices nationwide have observed in anti-Islam rhetoric, it would not be surprising that an extremist group would seek to turn that bigoted rhetoric into violent actions," said CAIR National Executive Director Nihad Awad. "At this stage, we are seeking more information about possible threats to American Muslim organizations and are urging the offices of CAIR and other Islamic institutions nationwide to take appropriate security precautions."
He added that just last week, CAIR called on Republican leaders to repudiate racist taunts by tea party opponents of health care reform targeting a Muslim congressman and another African-American lawmaker on Capitol Hill.
SEE: Muslim Congressman Called 'N**ger' by Tea Party Protesters
http://tinyurl.com/carsonnword
Awad also noted that CAIR recently expressed concern about the reported rise in the number of anti-government and anti-immigrant extremist groups during the past year.
SEE: CAIR Concerned About Reported Rise in Militias, 'Patriot' Groups
http://tinyurl.com/riseinmilitias
CAIR is urging American Muslim individuals and institutions to review advice on security procedures contained in its "Muslim Community Safety Kit."
SEE: Muslim Community Safety Kit
http://www.cair.com/ActionCenter/CommunityToolKit.aspx
Become a Fan of CAIR on Facebook
http://www.facebook.com/pages/CAIR/42590232694
Subscribe to CAIR's E-Mail List
http://tinyurl.com/cairsubscribe
CAIR is America's largest Muslim civil liberties and advocacy organization. Its mission is to enhance the understanding of Islam, encourage dialogue, protect civil liberties, empower American Muslims, and build coalitions that promote justice and mutual understanding.
CONTACT: CAIR National Communications Director Ibrahim Hooper, 202-744-7726, E-Mail: ihooper@cair.com; CAIR-MI Executive Director Dawud Walid, 248-842-1418, E-Mail: dwalid@cair.com; CAIR-Chicago Executive Director Ahmed Rehab, 202-870-0166, E-mail: arehab@cair.com; CAIR-Cleveland Executive Director Julia Shearson, 216-440-2247, E-Mail: jshearson@cair.com; CAIR Communications Coordinator Amina Rubin, 202-488-8787, 202-341-4171, E-Mail: arubin@cair.com
Source: Council on American-Islamic Relations
CONTACT: CAIR National Communications Director Ibrahim Hooper,
+1-202-744-7726, ihooper@cair.com; CAIR-MI Executive Director Dawud Walid,
+1-248-842-1418, dwalid@cair.com; CAIR-Chicago Executive Director Ahmed Rehab,
+1-202-870-0166, arehab@cair.com; CAIR-Cleveland Executive Director Julia
Shearson, +1-216-440-2247, jshearson@cair.com; CAIR Communications Coordinator
Amina Rubin, +1-202-488-8787, +1-202-341-4171, arubin@cair.com
Web Site: Council on American-Islamic Relations
Justice Department Settles Sexual Harassment Lawsuit Against Dona Ana County, New Mexico
29 Mar 2010 18:08 Africa/Lagos
Justice Department Settles Sexual Harassment Lawsuit Against Dona Ana County, New Mexico
WASHINGTON, March 29 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The Justice Department announced today that a federal court has approved a settlement resolving a sexual harassment lawsuit against Dona Ana County, New Mexico. The department's complaint, filed in May 2008, alleges that the county subjected five women, all current or former county custodians, to a hostile work environment because of their sex, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
The complaint alleges that over the course of approximately 10 months, the male supervisor of these female custodians regularly used derogatory and offensive gender-based terms to describe women and commented about the sexual activities of women. The complaint also alleges that, despite the county's receipt of multiple complaints about the harassment, the county repeatedly failed to take prompt and appropriate corrective action to stop the harassment.
Under the terms of the settlement, approved by the federal court in New Mexico, the county must offer to pay $150,000, divided among the five female victims, to compensate them for their emotional suffering resulting from the harassment. The settlement also requires that the county make additional changes to its policies and procedures related to discrimination, including changes related to reporting and investigating complaints of discrimination and disciplining offenders and individuals who receive reports of discrimination but fail to take appropriate action. The county must ensure that policies and procedures related to discrimination are accessible to Spanish-speaking employees, as well as take additional steps to ensure that all employees are provided appropriate anti-discrimination training.
"It is critical that employers understand what constitutes sexual harassment, and that they take allegations of harassment seriously," said Thomas E. Perez, Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division. "The Civil Rights Division is committed to ensuring that all individuals are able to exercise their right to report to workplaces that are free of harassment, and that employers who become aware of harassment within their ranks root it out promptly."
The division was assisted in its litigation of this case by the New Mexico U.S. Attorney's Office. The division's lawsuit and underlying investigation in this case were prompted by an investigation and referral by the El Paso Area Office of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
Additional information about the Civil Rights Division is available on its Web site at www.justice.gov/crt. Additional information about Title VII and how to file a complaint of discrimination can be found on the Justice Department Web site at www.justice.gov/crt/emp/.
Source: U.S. Department of Justice
CONTACT: U.S. Department of Justice Office of Public Affairs,
+1-202-514-2007, TDD, +1-202-514-1888
Web Site: http://www.justice.gov/
Justice Department Settles Sexual Harassment Lawsuit Against Dona Ana County, New Mexico
WASHINGTON, March 29 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The Justice Department announced today that a federal court has approved a settlement resolving a sexual harassment lawsuit against Dona Ana County, New Mexico. The department's complaint, filed in May 2008, alleges that the county subjected five women, all current or former county custodians, to a hostile work environment because of their sex, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
The complaint alleges that over the course of approximately 10 months, the male supervisor of these female custodians regularly used derogatory and offensive gender-based terms to describe women and commented about the sexual activities of women. The complaint also alleges that, despite the county's receipt of multiple complaints about the harassment, the county repeatedly failed to take prompt and appropriate corrective action to stop the harassment.
Under the terms of the settlement, approved by the federal court in New Mexico, the county must offer to pay $150,000, divided among the five female victims, to compensate them for their emotional suffering resulting from the harassment. The settlement also requires that the county make additional changes to its policies and procedures related to discrimination, including changes related to reporting and investigating complaints of discrimination and disciplining offenders and individuals who receive reports of discrimination but fail to take appropriate action. The county must ensure that policies and procedures related to discrimination are accessible to Spanish-speaking employees, as well as take additional steps to ensure that all employees are provided appropriate anti-discrimination training.
"It is critical that employers understand what constitutes sexual harassment, and that they take allegations of harassment seriously," said Thomas E. Perez, Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division. "The Civil Rights Division is committed to ensuring that all individuals are able to exercise their right to report to workplaces that are free of harassment, and that employers who become aware of harassment within their ranks root it out promptly."
The division was assisted in its litigation of this case by the New Mexico U.S. Attorney's Office. The division's lawsuit and underlying investigation in this case were prompted by an investigation and referral by the El Paso Area Office of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
Additional information about the Civil Rights Division is available on its Web site at www.justice.gov/crt. Additional information about Title VII and how to file a complaint of discrimination can be found on the Justice Department Web site at www.justice.gov/crt/emp/.
Source: U.S. Department of Justice
CONTACT: U.S. Department of Justice Office of Public Affairs,
+1-202-514-2007, TDD, +1-202-514-1888
Web Site: http://www.justice.gov/
American Doctors Sue to Overturn the Health Care Bill
29 Mar 2010 17:13 Africa/Lagos
Doctors Sue to Overturn the Health Care Bill
TUCSON, Ariz., March 29 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) became the first medical society to sue to overturn the newly enacted health care bill, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). AAPS sued Friday in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (AAPS v. Sebelius et al.).
"If the PPACA goes unchallenged, then it spells the end of freedom in medicine as we know it," observed Jane Orient, M.D., the Executive Director of AAPS. "Courts should not allow this massive intrusion into the practice of medicine and the rights of patients."
"There will be a dire shortage of physicians if the PPACA becomes effective and is not overturned by the courts."
The PPACA requires most Americans to buy government-approved insurance starting in 2014, or face stiff penalties. Insurance company executives will be enriched by this requirement, but it violates the Fifth Amendment protection against the government forcing one person to pay cash to another. AAPS is the first to assert this important constitutional claim.
The PPACA also violates the Tenth Amendment, the Commerce Clause, and the provisions authorizing taxation. The Taxing and Spending power cannot be invoked, as the premiums go to private insurance companies. The traditional sovereignty of the States over the practice of medicine is destroyed by the PPACA.
AAPS notes that in scoring the proposal the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) was bound by assumptions imposed by Congress, including the ability to "save" $500 billion in Medicare, and to redirect $50 billion from Social Security. HHS Secretary Sebelius stated that PPACA would reduce the federal deficit, knowing the opposite to be true if these assumptions are unrealistic.
AAPS asks the Court to enjoin the government from promulgating or enforcing insurance mandates and require HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and Social Security Commissioner Michael Astrue to provide the Court with an accounting of Medicare and Social Security solvency.
Congress recognized that PPACA cannot be funded without the insurance mandates, and will become unenforceable without them.
Court action is necessary "to preserve individual liberty" and "to prevent PPACA from bankrupting the United States generally and Medicare and Social Security specifically," AAPS stated.
AAPS is a voice for patient and physician independence since 1943. The complaint is posted at http://www.aapsonline.org/hhslawsuit
Source: Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS)
CONTACT: Jane Orient, M.D. +1-800-635-1196, jorient@mindspring.com
Web Site: http://www.aapsonline.org/
Doctors Sue to Overturn the Health Care Bill
TUCSON, Ariz., March 29 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) became the first medical society to sue to overturn the newly enacted health care bill, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). AAPS sued Friday in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (AAPS v. Sebelius et al.).
"If the PPACA goes unchallenged, then it spells the end of freedom in medicine as we know it," observed Jane Orient, M.D., the Executive Director of AAPS. "Courts should not allow this massive intrusion into the practice of medicine and the rights of patients."
"There will be a dire shortage of physicians if the PPACA becomes effective and is not overturned by the courts."
The PPACA requires most Americans to buy government-approved insurance starting in 2014, or face stiff penalties. Insurance company executives will be enriched by this requirement, but it violates the Fifth Amendment protection against the government forcing one person to pay cash to another. AAPS is the first to assert this important constitutional claim.
The PPACA also violates the Tenth Amendment, the Commerce Clause, and the provisions authorizing taxation. The Taxing and Spending power cannot be invoked, as the premiums go to private insurance companies. The traditional sovereignty of the States over the practice of medicine is destroyed by the PPACA.
AAPS notes that in scoring the proposal the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) was bound by assumptions imposed by Congress, including the ability to "save" $500 billion in Medicare, and to redirect $50 billion from Social Security. HHS Secretary Sebelius stated that PPACA would reduce the federal deficit, knowing the opposite to be true if these assumptions are unrealistic.
AAPS asks the Court to enjoin the government from promulgating or enforcing insurance mandates and require HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and Social Security Commissioner Michael Astrue to provide the Court with an accounting of Medicare and Social Security solvency.
Congress recognized that PPACA cannot be funded without the insurance mandates, and will become unenforceable without them.
Court action is necessary "to preserve individual liberty" and "to prevent PPACA from bankrupting the United States generally and Medicare and Social Security specifically," AAPS stated.
AAPS is a voice for patient and physician independence since 1943. The complaint is posted at http://www.aapsonline.org/hhslawsuit
Source: Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS)
CONTACT: Jane Orient, M.D. +1-800-635-1196, jorient@mindspring.com
Web Site: http://www.aapsonline.org/
American Doctors Sue to Overturn the Health Care Bill
29 Mar 2010 17:13 Africa/Lagos
Doctors Sue to Overturn the Health Care Bill
TUCSON, Ariz., March 29 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) became the first medical society to sue to overturn the newly enacted health care bill, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). AAPS sued Friday in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (AAPS v. Sebelius et al.).
"If the PPACA goes unchallenged, then it spells the end of freedom in medicine as we know it," observed Jane Orient, M.D., the Executive Director of AAPS. "Courts should not allow this massive intrusion into the practice of medicine and the rights of patients."
"There will be a dire shortage of physicians if the PPACA becomes effective and is not overturned by the courts."
The PPACA requires most Americans to buy government-approved insurance starting in 2014, or face stiff penalties. Insurance company executives will be enriched by this requirement, but it violates the Fifth Amendment protection against the government forcing one person to pay cash to another. AAPS is the first to assert this important constitutional claim.
The PPACA also violates the Tenth Amendment, the Commerce Clause, and the provisions authorizing taxation. The Taxing and Spending power cannot be invoked, as the premiums go to private insurance companies. The traditional sovereignty of the States over the practice of medicine is destroyed by the PPACA.
AAPS notes that in scoring the proposal the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) was bound by assumptions imposed by Congress, including the ability to "save" $500 billion in Medicare, and to redirect $50 billion from Social Security. HHS Secretary Sebelius stated that PPACA would reduce the federal deficit, knowing the opposite to be true if these assumptions are unrealistic.
AAPS asks the Court to enjoin the government from promulgating or enforcing insurance mandates and require HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and Social Security Commissioner Michael Astrue to provide the Court with an accounting of Medicare and Social Security solvency.
Congress recognized that PPACA cannot be funded without the insurance mandates, and will become unenforceable without them.
Court action is necessary "to preserve individual liberty" and "to prevent PPACA from bankrupting the United States generally and Medicare and Social Security specifically," AAPS stated.
AAPS is a voice for patient and physician independence since 1943. The complaint is posted at http://www.aapsonline.org/hhslawsuit
Source: Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS)
CONTACT: Jane Orient, M.D. +1-800-635-1196, jorient@mindspring.com
Web Site: http://www.aapsonline.org/
Doctors Sue to Overturn the Health Care Bill
TUCSON, Ariz., March 29 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) became the first medical society to sue to overturn the newly enacted health care bill, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). AAPS sued Friday in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (AAPS v. Sebelius et al.).
"If the PPACA goes unchallenged, then it spells the end of freedom in medicine as we know it," observed Jane Orient, M.D., the Executive Director of AAPS. "Courts should not allow this massive intrusion into the practice of medicine and the rights of patients."
"There will be a dire shortage of physicians if the PPACA becomes effective and is not overturned by the courts."
The PPACA requires most Americans to buy government-approved insurance starting in 2014, or face stiff penalties. Insurance company executives will be enriched by this requirement, but it violates the Fifth Amendment protection against the government forcing one person to pay cash to another. AAPS is the first to assert this important constitutional claim.
The PPACA also violates the Tenth Amendment, the Commerce Clause, and the provisions authorizing taxation. The Taxing and Spending power cannot be invoked, as the premiums go to private insurance companies. The traditional sovereignty of the States over the practice of medicine is destroyed by the PPACA.
AAPS notes that in scoring the proposal the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) was bound by assumptions imposed by Congress, including the ability to "save" $500 billion in Medicare, and to redirect $50 billion from Social Security. HHS Secretary Sebelius stated that PPACA would reduce the federal deficit, knowing the opposite to be true if these assumptions are unrealistic.
AAPS asks the Court to enjoin the government from promulgating or enforcing insurance mandates and require HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and Social Security Commissioner Michael Astrue to provide the Court with an accounting of Medicare and Social Security solvency.
Congress recognized that PPACA cannot be funded without the insurance mandates, and will become unenforceable without them.
Court action is necessary "to preserve individual liberty" and "to prevent PPACA from bankrupting the United States generally and Medicare and Social Security specifically," AAPS stated.
AAPS is a voice for patient and physician independence since 1943. The complaint is posted at http://www.aapsonline.org/hhslawsuit
Source: Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS)
CONTACT: Jane Orient, M.D. +1-800-635-1196, jorient@mindspring.com
Web Site: http://www.aapsonline.org/
International Community Must Declare All Suicide Bombings Crimes Against Humanity
29 Mar 2010 16:36 Africa/Lagos
Simon Wiesenthal Center: 40 Dead From Latest Terror Attacks: 'International Community Must Declare All Suicide Bombings Crimes Against Humanity'
NEW YORK, March 29 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The Simon Wiesenthal Center expressed its solidarity and condolences with the latest innocent victims of terrorism who were murdered and maimed by suicide bombers in Moscow's Subway system.
"For years our campaign to have all suicide bombings -- whoever the perpetrator or targeted victims -- to be declared crimes against humanity," said Rabbi Abraham Cooper, associate dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Center. "Such a move would enable nations and victims of such terror the legal tools to hold accountable, all those who encourage, validate, aid and abet such contemptible acts by non-state entities," he added.
Cooper, who is scheduled to participate in an interfaith conference next month in Azerbaijan with the Metropolitan of Moscow and Muslim faith leaders, will urge the gathering to declare all such deeds "crimes against G-d."
"In an era when young people are encouraged to mass murder others by blowing themselves up with the promise of heaven as a reward, religious leaders have a special obligation to denounce such acts as desecrations of faith," Cooper concluded.
About The Simon Wiesenthal Center
The Simon Wiesenthal Center is one of the largest international Jewish human rights organizations with over 400,000 member families in the United States. It is an NGO at international agencies including the United Nations, UNESCO, the OSCE, the OAS, the Council of Europe and the Latin American Parliament (Parlatino).
Source: Simon Wiesenthal Center
CONTACT: John McCook of Rubenstein Public Relations, +1-212-843-8365,
Jmccook@rubensteinpr.com, for Simon Wiesenthal Center
Simon Wiesenthal Center: 40 Dead From Latest Terror Attacks: 'International Community Must Declare All Suicide Bombings Crimes Against Humanity'
NEW YORK, March 29 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The Simon Wiesenthal Center expressed its solidarity and condolences with the latest innocent victims of terrorism who were murdered and maimed by suicide bombers in Moscow's Subway system.
"For years our campaign to have all suicide bombings -- whoever the perpetrator or targeted victims -- to be declared crimes against humanity," said Rabbi Abraham Cooper, associate dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Center. "Such a move would enable nations and victims of such terror the legal tools to hold accountable, all those who encourage, validate, aid and abet such contemptible acts by non-state entities," he added.
Cooper, who is scheduled to participate in an interfaith conference next month in Azerbaijan with the Metropolitan of Moscow and Muslim faith leaders, will urge the gathering to declare all such deeds "crimes against G-d."
"In an era when young people are encouraged to mass murder others by blowing themselves up with the promise of heaven as a reward, religious leaders have a special obligation to denounce such acts as desecrations of faith," Cooper concluded.
About The Simon Wiesenthal Center
The Simon Wiesenthal Center is one of the largest international Jewish human rights organizations with over 400,000 member families in the United States. It is an NGO at international agencies including the United Nations, UNESCO, the OSCE, the OAS, the Council of Europe and the Latin American Parliament (Parlatino).
Source: Simon Wiesenthal Center
CONTACT: John McCook of Rubenstein Public Relations, +1-212-843-8365,
Jmccook@rubensteinpr.com, for Simon Wiesenthal Center
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)